What About Conscientious
Objection and Noncombatancy?
Since the beginnings of the Seventh-day Adventist Church the denomination
has been challenged with the issues of what members should do in time
of war. On one hand each member is to be a loyal citizen of their
country (render therefore unto Caesar what is Caesar’s...) And at
the same time remain loyal to God (and unto God what is God’s. Matthew
22:21). This can, obviously, create a tension for someone who also
reads in the Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not kill” and then hears
the military requiring them to train with a weapon.
Historically
the development has followed along these lines:
1860-63 The Adventist Church
begins to organize in North America
1881 James White’s editorial in the Review “The Nation” where
he says, “The fourth precept of that law says ‘Remember the Sabbath
to keep it holy’, the sixth says ‘Thou shalt not kill.’ But in the
case of drafting the government assumes the responsibility of the
violation of law of God, and it would madness to resist.” (August
2, 1862, vol. 20, page 84)
1864 Adventist leaders appeal successfully
to the Governor of Michigan and receive recognition as being conscientiously
opposed to the bearing of arms. Similar letters to the governors
of Wisconsin, Illinois and Pennsylvania are sent and received with
approval.
1886 Ellen G. White, while visiting Switzerland, commends several
men who must do their military time in the Swiss Army. While she
comments on their regimental ribbons and uniforms, she makes no
remarks about weapons use. (Letter 23, 1886)
1918 President Woodrow Wilson issues an executive order allowing
for religious conscientious objectors to serve in the U. S. military.
July...the
General Conference authorizes $30,000 to construct barracks and
begin training of non-combatants at Loma Linda and the Washington
Sanitarium for pre-induction training in the medical corps.
1950 Dr. Everett Dick begins the Medical Cadet Corps at Union
College.
1953 U. S. Army begins Operation Whitecoat (1953-1973) where
nearly 2500 Adventist young men volunteer as human subjects in medical
preventive medicine studies.
1954 The Annual Council states that the official position of
the church is non-combatant. The National Service Organization is
begun to work with military Adventist personnel.
1969 Annual Council (October 12) reaffirms the statements of
1954 then goes on to change the wording to “the church advocates
non-combatancy, but allows members to elect to be pacifists as well.
1972 Annual Council affirms the statements of 1954 and 1969,
but makes the decision a personal matter for each member. This leaves
the decision up to the individual with strong encouragement from
the denomination to consider the historical position of non-combatancy
but leaves the door open to those who elect to train with or carry
arms.
Thus,
it is seen that the first statements were modified from a pure combatant
stance, when drafted into service, to a non-combatant position to
a non-combatant recommendation without a church requirement to be
a non-combatant. Careful examination of the dates helps explain
the changes. Initially, during the Civil War, the Adventist Church
was struggling with many issues of identity and theology. There
was some confusion and much discussion. The refined decision was
to serve honorably in the military, but to do so as non-combatants.
That
remained in place until 1969. What happened then? The U. S. was
involved in Vietnam, and only those individuals who could show religious
backing for their pacifism would be released to alternate duty.
Since the Adventist church’s stance was non-combatancy (serving
without weapons) any Adventist drafted who claimed to be a pacifist
was denied that status because the stance was at variance with the
church’s stated policy. Hence the 1969 change to allow for pacifism
as a choice while encouraging members to serve as non-combatants.
When members are allowed to select how they shall serve, they may
also elect to serve being trained with weapons and as combatants,
although that is not the recommended type of service.
This
remains as the church’s stance today. The Seventh-day Adventist
Church advocates that members serve in the military as non-combatants,
but accepts those who elect to serve in other capacities or not
to serve at all--according to the conscience of the individual member.
The church, therefore, ceased being the conscience of the individual
and began a process of informing the individual in order for them
to make individual decisions for which they are personally responsible.
It
must also be recognized that in the initial stages of the church
organization all Adventists lived in the Northeastern part of the
United States. That has changed into a 12 million membership spread
around the globe. In some nations it is not an option to serve as
a non-combatant and it would be impossible for the church to mandate
that members there serve in that capacity. Thus the current recommendation
(not requirement) for non-combatant service.
BY
U. S. and international law, all military chaplains and physicians
are non-combatants, and medical aid personnel can carry weapons
to protect their patients if they elect to do so. Some medics serve
without bearing arms of any kind. The most famous of these is, of
course, Desmond Doss, who won the Congressional Medal of Honor for
service on Okinawa as a combat medic who saved the lives of over
70 of his unit who were wounded in one action. He remains as the
only CMH winner who won that honor as a non-combatant. |